According to Jean Baudrillard (1929-2007), simulation is dedicated to total
experiential identification through immersion.
It conceals the absence of the real which to my mind, is exactly what
Plato was worried about happening with imitation. The identity of the viewer
becomes wrapped within the simulacra a to such an extent that all aspects of the
psyche become conformed to that experience (Baudrillard .
So it seems to me that simulation always has a definitive
intention that is ever conscious of the simulacra. Simulation is about creating an objective
experience. It is more scientific,
calculated and concrete. Because there
is no referent, it becomes a reference.
Simulation is what happens when the sense of a “profound reality,” as
Baudrillard calls it is lost. Where it
lacks meaning to the actual, it reinforces meaning if the “other” because is
imposes an entirely new reality on the mind.
This makes simulacra an invaluable tool in method of control,
suppression and oppression.
As a method of control, simulations can be used as a tool
for anticipating outcomes through scientific method. In this context, simulation goes beyond
potential into the realm of probability.
As a method of suppression, it refers to the concealing the
absence of the real that Baudrillard describes as a “system of death.” The actual has already been dismantled and
usurped by the simulacra, which continues to dismantle and usurp that which was
related to the original. All of this can
only begin with the oppression of the original.
As a tool of oppression, simulacrum undermines the existence of the
actual by occupying their space and or function, until they are destroyed and
suppression must step in.
I believe celebrity culture is the latest pervasive
simulacrum that challenges the actual on multiple levels. It is to the point now that people are made
celebrated simply for living. This is
the premise behind reality television, specifically “The Real Housewives”
franchise. They perfectly illustrate the
“system of death” Baudrillard observes as a threat to the real. It begins with the idea of a “housewife”
which itself is a simulacrum. Its
connotation is a woman whose position in society is related to her home and the
maintenance of it. It emphasizes that the
value of a woman exists on material things outside herself. In actuality, there is no such thing as a
housewife since, what is most obvious and counter to what the name suggests, a
woman cannot be married to a house. A
woman is married to another person.
Replacing the role of a spouse with that of an object destroys the idea
of a partner and replaces a person with an object. In this light, it makes sense that in many of
the “wives” of the The Real Housewives
series are not even married. They are
attached to external things, like career, money, and material possessions. These are sought after as sources of the
personal fulfillment. Now I have no
problem with a woman who enjoys her career and works hard to advance it, but
these shows both portray and are manifestations that these women are willing to
possess at the expense of meaningful interpersonal relationships.
The shows producers seek to re-present the housewife as a “woman
of the new millennium” smart, strong and progressive. However the very assumption that a woman is
less of those things because she chooses her home life as her primary
occupation undermines the actual, and erodes its substance.
Every so often a housewife will express the desire to pursue a career
outside of her home, but this too is a simulation. It hides the fact that her
participation in the series is proof that she has already done so.
This is only one example of how reality television is the
simulation Baudrillard describes.
Essentially, actual social paradigms such as the idea of family, are first
undermined, then dismantled, and finally reconfigured into oppressive social
paradigms. They are oppressive because they are presented as a true standard
with out being rooted in anything tangible or practical.
On the other hand, The
Real Husbands of Hollywood is satire on the Real Housewives series. It
simulates the overall concept of the “original” Real Housewives franchise as a video chronicle of everyday lives of
Hollywood celebrity husbands. The actors simulate their own lives as they play caricatures of their public
personas.
It also simulates the
entire concept of reality television. Juxtaposing
the fully fictional antics portrayed on The
Real Husbands of Hollywood with the supposed realities of The Real Housewives, the viewer cannot
help but question the veracity of what the latter is trying convince us In this example, simulation is used to reverse
itself. Because of the objectivity
created through simulation, the viewer can ultimately be lead back to the
beginning concepts that original formally occupied.
References
Baudrillard,
Jean. Simulacra and Simulation. Translated by Sheila Faria Glaser. Ann
Arbor, Michigan: University of
Michigan Press, 1994.
No comments:
Post a Comment